Saturday, November 7, 2015

Weekly Highlights: The Failure of the Union Election Commission


2 - 7 October 2015

Weekly Highlights
2015 Elections Edition

The Failure of the Union Election Commission

On 4 November, Human Rights Watch (HRW) released a briefing on the fundamental flaws of Burma's 2015 elections. Among numerous shortcomings, the statement highlighted the unapologetically biased nature of the Union Election Commission (UEC); an electoral body that should encourage the elections to be democratic – not influence them.  Unfortunately, as HRW points out, the UEC is led be a Chairman with a clear affinity for the Union Solidarity and Development Party (USDP) and whose commission members are appointed – or removed – directly by the authority of Burma's President. 

HRW's statement also cites the lack of a formal complaint mechanism and a needlessly broad mandate as features that threaten the legitimacy of the UEC. A report from the Carter Center also documents how the UEC suffers from an inherent lack of transparency, in everything from the organization's regular decision-making process to the handling of voting cancellations based on "security" concerns.

The UEC, after all, was formed with a mandate to "enable the holding of elections to the first Hluttaw [Parliament] and to supervise the political parties." Unfortunately, the numerous failings of the organization demonstrate that it is clearly not prepared to provide Burma with the necessary resources it needs to hold a "free and fair election." For instance, the UEC has still not figured out how to properly compile a voter list that is not rife with errors or that does not exclude a vast number of eligible voters. The UEC also stumbled during the advanced voting process, running the risk of enhancing the already dire state of disenfranchisement in Burma.

On other occasions, the UEC has demonstrated a blatant disregard for international standards regarding democratic elections. The decision to ban any criticism from political parties against the 2008 Constitution and the Burma Army is one particular example of the UEC overstepping its responsibilities, while clearly demonstrating its own political allegiances. The muzzling and control of media coverage during the 2015 elections is yet another concern. Last year, the UEC demonstrated an attempt to influence politics by condemning Daw Aung San Suu Kyi's platform surrounding constitutional amendment.

The importance of a legitimate, credible, and effective election commission cannot be understated. Considering the UEC's shortcomings, 8 November could see a repeat of the fraudulent 2010 elections, including all of the same issues regarding voter coercion, bribery, and ballot tampering. Instead, the UEC should implement its actual mandate and supervise the elections to ensure they are transparent, unbiased, and ultimately representative of the desires of the people of Burma.

Realistically, the UEC has no time at this point – or more importantly the political will – to reverse its shortcomings and become an effective and credible electoral commission. The onus of ensuring a democratic election will ultimately fall upon election observers, including the European Union, the United States' Carter Center, and local observers. It is therefore important that these election observers make appropriate efforts to understand and realize the shortcomings and biases of the UEC in order to accurately report on any flaws, undemocratic behavior and fraudulent proceedings during the pre-election period, on election day itself, and the post-election period. There should be an accurate report, analyzed with international human rights standards, on how peoples' political rights to both run and vote in this election have been violated. When the UEC falls short of its obligations and responsibilities, the international community, through its election observation missions, must be prepared to respond without any reservation to their current engagement with the Burma Government, and address the issues on the ground in a manner that reflects the reality faced by the people of Burma.

Editor's Note: The Weekly Highlights will remain focused on the General Elections in Burma over the following weeks. Please check back for continued analysis on election related news

Latest from the Blog

Burma/Myanmar's 2015 Elections: Obstacles to Inclusive, Credible and Free and Fair Elections

By Burma Partnership

Statements and Press Releases

Myanmar: Elections Marred by Growing Repression and Rohingya Disenfranchisement

By Amnesty International

Myanmar: There Can be No Democratic Elections Without Respect for Human Rights

By Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development

Myanmar Elections Cannot be Considered Inclusive or Credible

By ASEAN Parliamentarians for Human Rights

UK Must Support UN Inquiry Into Possible Rohingya Genocide

By Burma Campaign UK

Time for the Government to Accept the Reality of Human Rights Problems, Take Effective Measures and Move Forward

By Burma-Myanmar UPR Forum

Give Rohingya Back Their Vote – Stop Genocide Against The Rohingya

By Burmese Rohingya Organisation UK

New Rohingya Election Briefing Paper Presented In UK Parliament

By Burmese Rohingya Organisation UK

Burma: Calls for Tolerance and Respect During elections
By Christian Solidarity Worldwide

Statement by the Diplomatic Missions of Australia, Canada, Denmark, France, Japan, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Norway, Republic of Korea, Sweden, the United Kingdom, the United States of America, and the United Nations on Myanmar's Elections

By Diplomatic of Australia, Canada, Denmark, France, Norway, Republic of Korea, Japan, Sweden, The United Kingdom, The United States of America and United Nations

EU Election Observation Mission Deploys 62 Short-term Observers – Over 150 EU Observers in Total to Observe on Election Day

By European Union Election Observation Mission

International Human Rights Organizations Call for Accountability of Myanmar's Minister of Home Affairs

By Global Justice Center

Human Rights Groups Call for Arrest and Prosecution of Myanmar's Minister of Home Affairs for War Crimes and Human Rights Violations

By Global Justice Center

Burma: Election Fundamentally Flawed

By Human Rights Watch

Political Parties Neglect Human Rights Priorities

By International Federation for Human Rights

Naypyidaw Must Immediately Stop its Attacks in Central Shan State and Let Communities Return Home

By Shan Community Based Organizations

Naypyidaw's escalated offensive in central Shan State displaces over 6,000; four civilians injured by indiscriminate shelling and shooting

By Shan Human Rights Foundation

လြဳိင္လင္ခရုိင္ ေက်းသီးျမိဳ႔နယ္ မုိင္းေနာင္ျမိဳ႔အနီး ၀ိန္းေကာင္ေက်းရြာရွိ တပ္မေတာ္တပ္ရင္းဠာနခ်ဳပ္သုိ႔ အက္စ္အက္စ္ေအ(၀မ္ဟုိင္း)အဖဲြ႔က ထပ္မံလာေရာက္တုိက္ခုိက္သည္ ဟုဆုိေသာ ျမ၀တီသတင္းဠာနႏွင့္ပတ္သက္၍ သတင္းထုတ္ျပန္ခ်က္

By Shan State Progress Party

Statement by Adama Dieng, Special Adviser of the Secretary-General on the Prevention of Genocide, and Jennifer Welsh, Special Adviser of the Secretary-General on the Responsibility to Protect, on the Upcoming Elections in Myanmar

By United Nations Special Advisers


Fear & Voting in Burma/Myanmar: 2015 Election

By Altsean-Burma

UN General Assembly 2015: Updates since the 2014 UNGA Resolution on Burma/Myanmar

By Altsean-Burma and International Federation for Human Rights

A New Briefing by Burmese Rohingya Organisation UK: No Hope For Rohingya From Burma Election

By Burmese Rohingya Organisation UK

Presidential Hopefuls in Myanmar's 2015 Elections

By Institute of Southeast Asian Studies

Half Empty: Burma's Political Parties and their Human Rights Commitments

By International Federation for Human Rights

Unhealed Wounds: ကုထုံးမဲ့လူ႔အခြင့္အေရးအနာမ်ား?

By United Rights Group

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
© Burma Partnership

Visit us at the following social networking sites.       



This message was sent to from:

Burma Partnership | | Burma Partnership | | Muang, Chiang Mai 50300, Thailand

Email Marketing by iContact - Try It Free!

No comments: